<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MFT Data Recovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dtidata.com/resourcecenter/2008/04/21/data-recovery-master-file-table-recovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dtidata.com/resourcecenter/2008/04/21/data-recovery-master-file-table-recovery/</link>
	<description>Hard drive recovery data recovery resource center with how to guides for windows RAID Snap server file system repair NTFS partition recovery tools tips and tricks to recover data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:43:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eBuster</title>
		<link>http://www.dtidata.com/resourcecenter/2008/04/21/data-recovery-master-file-table-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-6978</link>
		<dc:creator>eBuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtidata.com/resourcecenter/2008/04/21/data-recovery-master-file-table-recovery/#comment-6978</guid>
		<description>Hi

i have a friend that is pull millions of pages from eBay and several time the master table has become damaged even with 8 hard drives running to reduce the load (NOT RAID) so yes it would be good if you could backup and restore this table as running chkdsk /f takes ages and then you end up copying millions of files back from the backup server and the process take a day for 200GB of data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>i have a friend that is pull millions of pages from eBay and several time the master table has become damaged even with 8 hard drives running to reduce the load (NOT RAID) so yes it would be good if you could backup and restore this table as running chkdsk /f takes ages and then you end up copying millions of files back from the backup server and the process take a day for 200GB of data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.dtidata.com/resourcecenter/2008/04/21/data-recovery-master-file-table-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-3922</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtidata.com/resourcecenter/2008/04/21/data-recovery-master-file-table-recovery/#comment-3922</guid>
		<description>So, why not write a MFT remote back up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, why not write a MFT remote back up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Correa</title>
		<link>http://www.dtidata.com/resourcecenter/2008/04/21/data-recovery-master-file-table-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-3909</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Correa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtidata.com/resourcecenter/2008/04/21/data-recovery-master-file-table-recovery/#comment-3909</guid>
		<description>That is an excellent question and one that bears clarification.  The Master File Table can be several thousand records in size.  I have seen an MFT with as many as 7 million records.  That being said, an average MFT is between 150 and 200 thousand files.  This would make the MFT approximately 200 megabytes.  The overhead to maintain a mirror of the MFT records would be prohibitive so Microsoft has done this.

 The cluster, that lies directly in the center of the partition is the mirror cluster.  This mirror placement is used almost one hundred percent of the time.  The mirrored data is only what can fit in one cluster, which is four records.  The most important information in this mirror is the first record.  The first record is the MFT pointer, that tells the file system where the entire MFT is stored.  In other words, the first record of the Master File Table  tells us which clusters are used in order to store the Master File Table.  

  Many times I have seen the first record of the MFT destroyed, and in doing so making the entire file system unreadable.  I always thought this was a weakness of the file system.  Microsoft tries to overcome this by storing a copy of the first record in the center of the drive.

  Linux does something similar in as much as you have a super block saved several times in EXTFS, XFS, etc file systems.  You just never know where a bad sector might pop-up.

  So, to answer your question, there is not a full copy of the Master File Table on the partition, but there is a backup of the first record to the MFT.

  I hope this answers your question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an excellent question and one that bears clarification.  The Master File Table can be several thousand records in size.  I have seen an MFT with as many as 7 million records.  That being said, an average MFT is between 150 and 200 thousand files.  This would make the MFT approximately 200 megabytes.  The overhead to maintain a mirror of the MFT records would be prohibitive so Microsoft has done this.</p>
<p> The cluster, that lies directly in the center of the partition is the mirror cluster.  This mirror placement is used almost one hundred percent of the time.  The mirrored data is only what can fit in one cluster, which is four records.  The most important information in this mirror is the first record.  The first record is the MFT pointer, that tells the file system where the entire MFT is stored.  In other words, the first record of the Master File Table  tells us which clusters are used in order to store the Master File Table.  </p>
<p>  Many times I have seen the first record of the MFT destroyed, and in doing so making the entire file system unreadable.  I always thought this was a weakness of the file system.  Microsoft tries to overcome this by storing a copy of the first record in the center of the drive.</p>
<p>  Linux does something similar in as much as you have a super block saved several times in EXTFS, XFS, etc file systems.  You just never know where a bad sector might pop-up.</p>
<p>  So, to answer your question, there is not a full copy of the Master File Table on the partition, but there is a backup of the first record to the MFT.</p>
<p>  I hope this answers your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: an.drew</title>
		<link>http://www.dtidata.com/resourcecenter/2008/04/21/data-recovery-master-file-table-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-3905</link>
		<dc:creator>an.drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtidata.com/resourcecenter/2008/04/21/data-recovery-master-file-table-recovery/#comment-3905</guid>
		<description>Hello Dick

This is an interesting article and well put for those who don&#039;t understand the many technical names attributed to what makes a computer, a computer.

While I have been reading about the MTF, from various resources, I have seen mentioned the MTF Mirror.

Is it possible to access this for copying and backup without touching the main MTF and how would you suggest doing this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dick</p>
<p>This is an interesting article and well put for those who don&#8217;t understand the many technical names attributed to what makes a computer, a computer.</p>
<p>While I have been reading about the MTF, from various resources, I have seen mentioned the MTF Mirror.</p>
<p>Is it possible to access this for copying and backup without touching the main MTF and how would you suggest doing this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

